(* (c) Copyright 2006-2016 Microsoft Corporation and Inria.                  *)
(* Distributed under the terms of CeCILL-B.                                  *)
From HB Require Import structures.
From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq div.
From mathcomp Require Import choice fintype tuple bigop binomial order ssralg.
From mathcomp Require Import zmodp poly ssrnum ssrint archimedean rat matrix.
From mathcomp Require Import mxalgebra mxpoly closed_field polyrcf realalg.
Unset SsrOldRewriteGoalsOrder.  (* remove the line when requiring MathComp >= 2.6 *)

(**********************************************************************)
(*   This files defines the extension R[i] of a real field R,         *)
(* and provide it a structure of numeric field with a norm operator.  *)
(* When R is a real closed field, it also provides a structure of     *)
(* algebraically closed field for R[i], using a proof by Derksen      *)
(* (cf comments below, thanks to Pierre Lairez for finding the paper).*)
(* We provide an alias Rcomplex R of R[i] which holds structures of   *)
(* left-module over R and numeric field with a norm operator.         *)
(**********************************************************************)

Import Order.TTheory GRing.Theory Num.Theory.

Set Implicit Arguments.
Unset Strict Implicit.
Unset Printing Implicit Defensive.
#[local] Obligation Tactic := idtac.

Local Open Scope ring_scope.

Reserved Notation "x +i* y"
  (at level 40, left associativity, format "x  +i*  y").
Reserved Notation "x -i* y"
  (at level 40, left associativity, format "x  -i*  y").
Reserved Notation "R [i]"
  (at level 1, left associativity, format "R [i]").

Local Notation sgr := Num.sg.
Local Notation sqrtr := Num.sqrt.

Record complex (R : Type) : Type := Complex { Re : R; Im : R }.
Definition Rcomplex := complex.

Declare Scope complex_scope.
Delimit Scope complex_scope with C.
Local Open Scope complex_scope.

Definition real_complex_def (F : pzRingType) (phF : phant F) (x : F) :=
  Complex x 0.
Notation real_complex F := (@real_complex_def _ (Phant F)).
Notation "x %:C" := (real_complex _ x) (format "x %:C")  : complex_scope.
Notation "x +i* y" := (Complex x y) : complex_scope.
Notation "x -i* y" := (Complex x (- y)) : complex_scope.
Notation "x *i " := (Complex 0 x) (at level 8, format "x *i") : complex_scope.
Notation "''i'" := (Complex 0 1) : complex_scope.
Notation "R [i]" := (complex R) (format "R [i]").

(* Module ComplexInternal. *)
Module ComplexEqChoice.
Section ComplexEqChoice.

Variable R : Type.

Definition sqR_of_complex (x : R[i]) := let: a +i* b := x in [:: a; b].
Definition complex_of_sqR (x : seq R) :=
  if x is [:: a; b] then Some (a +i* b) else None.

Lemma complex_of_sqRK : pcancel sqR_of_complex complex_of_sqR.
Proof. by case. Qed.

End ComplexEqChoice.
End ComplexEqChoice.

HB.instance Definition _ (R : eqType) := Equality.copy R[i]
  (pcan_type (@ComplexEqChoice.complex_of_sqRK R)).
HB.instance Definition _ (R : choiceType) := Choice.copy R[i]
  (pcan_type (@ComplexEqChoice.complex_of_sqRK R)).
HB.instance Definition _ (R : countType) := Countable.copy R[i]
  (pcan_type (@ComplexEqChoice.complex_of_sqRK R)).
HB.instance Definition _ (R : eqType) := Equality.on (Rcomplex R).
HB.instance Definition _ (R : choiceType) := Choice.on (Rcomplex R).
HB.instance Definition _ (R : countType) := Countable.on (Rcomplex R).

Lemma eq_complex : forall (R : eqType) (x y : complex R),
  (x == y) = (Re x == Re y) && (Im x == Im y).
Proof.
move=> R [a b] [c d] /=.
apply/eqP/andP; first by move=> [-> ->]; split.
by case; move/eqP->; move/eqP->.
Qed.

Lemma complexr0 (R : pzRingType) (x : R) : x +i* 0 = x%:C. Proof. by []. Qed.

Module ComplexField.
Section ComplexField_ringType.

Variable R : pzRingType.
Local Notation C := R[i].
Local Notation C0 := ((0 : R)%:C).

Definition addc (x y : R[i]) := let: a +i* b := x in let: c +i* d := y in
  (a + c) +i* (b + d).
Definition oppc (x : R[i]) := let: a +i* b := x in (- a) +i* (- b).

Program Definition complex_zmodMixin := @GRing.isZmodule.Build R[i]
  C0 oppc addc _ _ _ _.
Next Obligation. by move=> [a b] [c d] [e f] /=; rewrite !addrA. Qed.
Next Obligation. by move=> [a b] [c d] /=; congr (_ +i* _); rewrite addrC. Qed.
Next Obligation. by move=> [a b] /=; rewrite !add0r. Qed.
Next Obligation. by move=> [a b] /=; rewrite !addNr. Qed.
HB.instance Definition _ := complex_zmodMixin.
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.Zmodule.on (Rcomplex R).

Definition scalec (a : R) (x : R[i]) :=
  let: b +i* c := x in (a * b) +i* (a * c).

Program Definition complex_lmodMixin :=
  @GRing.Zmodule_isLmodule.Build R (Rcomplex R) scalec _ _ _ _.
Next Obligation. by move=> a b [c d] /=; rewrite !mulrA. Qed.
Next Obligation. by move=> [a b] /=; rewrite !mul1r. Qed.
Next Obligation. by move=> a [b c] [d e] /=; rewrite !mulrDr. Qed.
Next Obligation. by move=> [a b] c d /=; rewrite !mulrDl. Qed.
HB.instance Definition _ := complex_lmodMixin.

End ComplexField_ringType.

Section ComplexField_comRingType.
Variable R : comPzRingType.
Local Notation C := R[i].

Definition mulc (x y : C) := let: a +i* b := x in let: c +i* d := y in
  ((a * c) - (b * d)) +i* ((a * d) + (b * c)).

Lemma mulcC : commutative mulc.
Proof.
move=> [a b] [c d] /=.
by rewrite [c * b + _]addrC ![_ * c]mulrC ![_ * d]mulrC.
Qed.

Lemma mulcA : associative mulc.
Proof.
move=> [a b] [c d] [e f] /=.
rewrite !mulrDr !mulrDl !mulrN !mulNr !mulrA !opprD -!addrA.
by congr ((_ + _) +i* (_ + _)); rewrite !addrA addrAC;
  congr (_ + _); rewrite addrC.
Qed.

End ComplexField_comRingType.

Section ComplexField_fieldType.
Variable R : fieldType.
Local Notation C := R[i].
Local Notation C0 := ((0 : R)%:C).
Local Notation C1 := ((1 : R)%:C).

Definition invc (x : R[i]) := let: a +i* b := x in let n2 := (a ^+ 2 + b ^+ 2) in
  (a / n2) -i* (b / n2).

Lemma mul1c : left_id C1 (@mulc R).
Proof. by move=> [a b] /=; rewrite !mul1r !mul0r subr0 addr0. Qed.

Lemma mulc_addl : left_distributive (@mulc R) (@addc R).
Proof.
move=> [a b] [c d] [e f] /=; rewrite !mulrDl !opprD -!addrA.
by congr ((_ + _) +i* (_ + _)); rewrite addrCA.
Qed.

Lemma nonzero1c : C1 != C0. Proof. by rewrite eq_complex /= oner_eq0. Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.Zmodule_isComNzRing.Build R[i]
  (@mulcA R) (@mulcC R) mul1c mulc_addl nonzero1c.
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.ComNzRing.on (Rcomplex R).
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.Lalgebra.copy C C^o.

Program Definition complex_lalgMixin :=
  @GRing.Lmodule_isLalgebra.Build R (Rcomplex R) _.
Next Obligation.
by move=> a [ru iu] [rv iv]; apply/eqP; do 2?[apply/andP; split];
  rewrite // mulrDr ?mulrN !mulrA.
Qed.
HB.instance Definition _ := complex_lalgMixin.

End ComplexField_fieldType.

Local Ltac simpc := do ?
  [ rewrite -[(_ +i* _) - (_ +i* _)]/(_ +i* _)
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _) + (_ +i* _)]/(_ +i* _)
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _) * (_ +i* _)]/(_ +i* _)].

Section ComplexField_realFieldType.

Variable R : realFieldType.
Local Notation C := R[i].
Local Notation C0 := ((0 : R)%:C).
Local Notation C1 := ((1 : R)%:C).

Lemma mulVc : forall x, x != C0 -> mulc (invc x) x = C1.
Proof.
move=> [a b]; rewrite eq_complex => /= hab; rewrite !mulNr opprK.
rewrite ![_ / _ * _]mulrAC [b * a]mulrC subrr complexr0 -mulrDl mulfV //.
by rewrite paddr_eq0 -!expr2 ?expf_eq0 ?sqr_ge0.
Qed.

Lemma invc0 : invc C0 = C0. Proof. by rewrite /= !mul0r oppr0. Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.ComNzRing_isField.Build C mulVc invc0.
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.Field.on (Rcomplex R).

Lemma real_complex_is_additive : additive (real_complex R).
Proof. by move=> a b /=; simpc; rewrite subrr. Qed.

Lemma real_complex_is_multiplicative : multiplicative (real_complex R).
Proof. by split=> // a b /=; simpc; rewrite !mulr0 !mul0r addr0 subr0. Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.isAdditive.Build R R[i]
  (real_complex R) real_complex_is_additive.

HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.isMultiplicative.Build R R[i]
  (real_complex R) real_complex_is_multiplicative.

End ComplexField_realFieldType.

Module Normc.
Section Normc.
Variable R : rcfType.
Implicit Types x : R[i].

(*  TODO: when Pythagorean Fields are added, weaken to Pythagorean Field *)
Definition normc x :=
  let: a +i* b := x in sqrtr (a ^+ 2 + b ^+ 2).

Lemma normc0 : normc 0%C = 0 :> R.
Proof. by rewrite /normc /= expr0n/= addr0 sqrtr0. Qed.

Lemma normc1 : normc 1%C = 1 :> R.
Proof. by rewrite /normc /= expr0n/= expr1n addr0 sqrtr1. Qed.

Lemma eq0_normc x : normc x = 0 -> x = 0.
Proof.
case: x => a b /= /eqP; rewrite sqrtr_eq0 le_eqVlt => /orP[|]; last first.
  by rewrite ltNge addr_ge0 ?sqr_ge0.
by rewrite paddr_eq0 ?sqr_ge0 ?expf_eq0 //= => /andP[/eqP -> /eqP ->].
Qed.

Lemma normcM x y : normc (x * y) = normc x * normc y.
Proof.
move: x y => [a b] [c d] /=; rewrite -sqrtrM ?addr_ge0 ?sqr_ge0 //.
rewrite sqrrB sqrrD mulrDl !mulrDr -!exprMn.
rewrite mulrAC [b * d]mulrC !mulrA.
suff -> : forall (u v w z t : R), (u - v + w) + (z + v + t) = u + w + (z + t).
  by rewrite addrAC !addrA.
by move=> u v w z t; rewrite [_ - _ + _]addrAC [z + v]addrC !addrA addrNK.
Qed.

Lemma normcV x : normc x^-1 = (normc x)^-1.
Proof.
have [->|x0] := eqVneq x 0; first by rewrite ?(invr0,normc0).
have nx0 : normc x != 0 by apply: contra x0 => /eqP/eq0_normc ->.
by apply: (mulfI nx0); rewrite -normcM !divrr ?unitfE// normc1.
Qed.

End Normc.
End Normc.

Section ComplexField.
Variable R : rcfType.
Implicit Types x y : R[i].

Local Notation C := R[i].
Local Notation C0 := ((0 : R)%:C).
Local Notation C1 := ((1 : R)%:C).

Lemma Re_is_scalar : scalar (@Re R : Rcomplex R -> R).
Proof. by move=> a [b c] [d e]. Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ :=
  GRing.isLinear.Build R (Rcomplex R) R _ (@Re R : Rcomplex R -> R)
    Re_is_scalar.

Lemma Im_is_scalar : scalar (@Im R : Rcomplex R -> R).
Proof. by move=> a [b c] [d e]. Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ :=
  GRing.isLinear.Build R (Rcomplex R) R _ (@Im R : Rcomplex R -> R)
    Im_is_scalar.

Definition lec x y :=
  let: a +i* b := x in let: c +i* d := y in
    (d == b) && (a <= c).

Definition ltc x y :=
  let: a +i* b := x in let: c +i* d := y in
    (d == b) && (a < c).

Lemma ltc0_add x y : ltc 0 x -> ltc 0 y -> ltc 0 (x + y).
Proof.
move: x y => [a b] [c d] /= /andP [/eqP-> ha] /andP [/eqP-> hc].
by rewrite addr0 eqxx addr_gt0.
Qed.

Lemma ge0_lec_total x y : lec 0 x -> lec 0 y -> lec x y || lec y x.
Proof.
move: x y => [a b] [c d] /= /andP[/eqP -> a_ge0] /andP[/eqP -> c_ge0].
by rewrite eqxx le_total.
Qed.

Lemma subc_ge0 x y : lec 0 (y - x) = lec x y.
Proof. by move: x y => [a b] [c d] /=; simpc; rewrite subr_ge0 subr_eq0. Qed.

Lemma ltc_def x y : ltc x y = (y != x) && lec x y.
Proof.
move: x y => [a b] [c d] /=; simpc; rewrite eq_complex /=.
by have [] := altP eqP; rewrite ?(andbF, andbT) //= lt_def.
Qed.

Import Normc.

Notation normC x := (normc x)%:C.

Lemma eq0_normC x : normC x = 0 -> x = 0. Proof. by case=> /eq0_normc. Qed.

Lemma normCM x y : normC (x * y) = normC x * normC y.
Proof. by rewrite -rmorphM normcM. Qed.

Lemma lec_def x y : lec x y = (normC (y - x) == y - x).
Proof.
rewrite -subc_ge0; move: (_ - _) => [a b]; rewrite eq_complex /= eq_sym.
have [<- /=|_] := altP eqP; last by rewrite andbF.
by rewrite [0 ^+ _]mul0r addr0 andbT sqrtr_sqr ger0_def.
Qed.

Lemma lec_normD x y : lec (normC (x + y)) (normC x + normC y).
Proof.
move: x y => [a b] [c d] /=; simpc; rewrite addr0 eqxx /=.
rewrite -(@ler_pXn2r _ 2) -?topredE /= ?(ler_wpDr, sqrtr_ge0) //.
rewrite [X in _ <= X] sqrrD ?sqr_sqrtr;
   do ?by rewrite ?(ler_wpDr, sqrtr_ge0, sqr_ge0, mulr_ge0) //.
rewrite -addrA addrCA (monoRL (addrNK _) (lerD2r _)) !sqrrD.
set u := _ *+ 2; set v := _ *+ 2.
rewrite [a ^+ _ + _ + _]addrAC [b ^+ _ + _ + _]addrAC -[X in X - _]addrA.
rewrite [u + _]addrC [X in _ - X]addrAC [b ^+ _ + _]addrC.
rewrite [u]lock [v]lock !addrA; set x := (a ^+ 2 + _ + _ + _).
rewrite -[_ + locked u]addrA [leLHS]addrC addKr -!lock addrC.
have [huv|] := ger0P (u + v); last first.
  by move=> /ltW /le_trans -> //; rewrite pmulrn_lge0 // mulr_ge0 ?sqrtr_ge0.
rewrite -(@ler_pXn2r _ 2) -?topredE //=.
  by rewrite ?(pmulrn_lge0, mulr_ge0, sqrtr_ge0) //.
rewrite -mulr_natl !exprMn !sqr_sqrtr ?(ler_wpDr, sqr_ge0) //.
rewrite -mulrnDl -[in leLHS]mulr_natl !exprMn ler_pM2l ?exprn_gt0 ?ltr0n //.
rewrite sqrrD mulrDl !mulrDr -!exprMn addrAC -!addrA lerD2l !addrA.
rewrite [_ + (b * d) ^+ 2]addrC -addrA lerD2l.
have: 0 <= (a * d - b * c) ^+ 2 by rewrite sqr_ge0.
by rewrite sqrrB addrAC subr_ge0 [_ * c]mulrC mulrACA [d * _]mulrC.
Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ := Num.IntegralDomain_isNumRing.Build C
  lec_normD ltc0_add eq0_normC ge0_lec_total normCM lec_def ltc_def.

End ComplexField.
End ComplexField.
HB.export ComplexField.
(* we do not export the canonical structure of lmodType on purpose *)
(* i.e. no: Canonical ComplexField.complex_lmodType.               *)
(* indeed, this would prevent C fril having a normed module over C *)

Definition conjc {R : pzRingType} (x : R[i]) := let: a +i* b := x in a -i* b.
Notation "x ^*" := (conjc x) : complex_scope.
Local Open Scope complex_scope.
Delimit Scope complex_scope with C.

Ltac simpc := do ?
  [ rewrite -[- (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C - (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C + (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C * (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C ^*]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[_ *: (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C <= (_ +i* _)%C]/((_ == _) && (_ <= _))
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C < (_ +i* _)%C]/((_ == _) && (_ < _))
  | rewrite -[`|(_ +i* _)%C|]/(sqrtr (_ + _))%:C%C
  | rewrite (mulrNN, mulrN, mulNr, opprB, opprD, mulr0, mul0r,
    subr0, sub0r, addr0, add0r, mulr1, mul1r, subrr, opprK, oppr0,
    eqxx) ].


Section ComplexTheory.

Variable R : rcfType.
Implicit Types (k : R) (x y z : R[i]).

Lemma ReiNIm : forall x, Re (x * 'i%C) = - Im x.
Proof. by case=> a b; simpc. Qed.

Lemma ImiRe : forall x, Im (x * 'i%C) = Re x.
Proof. by case=> a b; simpc. Qed.

Lemma complexE x : x = (Re x)%:C + 'i%C * (Im x)%:C :> R[i].
Proof. by case: x => *; simpc. Qed.

Local Lemma real_complexE_deprecated k : k%:C = k +i* 0 :> R[i]. Proof. done. Qed.
#[deprecated(since="1.1.3", note="Use complexr0 instead.")]
Notation real_complexE := real_complexE_deprecated.

Lemma sqr_i : 'i%C ^+ 2 = -1 :> R[i].
Proof. by rewrite exprS; simpc; rewrite complexr0 rmorphN. Qed.

Lemma complexI : injective (real_complex R). Proof. by move=> x y []. Qed.

Lemma ler0c k : (0 <= k%:C) = (0 <= k). Proof. by simpc. Qed.

Lemma lecE : forall x y, (x <= y) = (Im y == Im x) && (Re x <= Re y).
Proof. by move=> [a b] [c d]. Qed.

Lemma ltcE : forall x y, (x < y) = (Im y == Im x) && (Re x < Re y).
Proof. by move=> [a b] [c d]. Qed.

Lemma lecR : forall k k', (k%:C <= k'%:C) = (k <= k').
Proof. by move=> k k'; simpc. Qed.

Lemma ltcR : forall k k', (k%:C < k'%:C) = (k < k').
Proof. by move=> k k'; simpc. Qed.

Lemma conjc_is_additive : additive (@conjc R).
Proof. by move=> [a b] [c d] /=; simpc; rewrite [d - _]addrC. Qed.

Lemma conjc_is_multiplicative : multiplicative (@conjc R).
Proof. by split=> [[a b] [c d]|] /=; simpc. Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.isAdditive.Build R[i] R[i] conjc
    conjc_is_additive.

HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.isMultiplicative.Build R[i] R[i] conjc
    conjc_is_multiplicative.

Lemma conjcK : involutive (@conjc R).
Proof. by move=> [a b] /=; rewrite opprK. Qed.

Lemma mulcJ_ge0 (x : R[i]) : 0 <= x * x^*%C.
Proof.
by move: x=> [a b]; simpc; rewrite mulrC addNr eqxx addr_ge0 ?sqr_ge0.
Qed.

Lemma conjc_real (x : R) : x%:C^* = x%:C.
Proof. by rewrite /= oppr0. Qed.

Lemma ReJ_add (x : R[i]) : (Re x)%:C =  (x + x^*%C) / 2%:R.
Proof.
case: x => a b; simpc; rewrite [0 ^+ 2]mul0r addr0 /=.
rewrite -!mulr2n -mulr_natr -mulrA [_ * (_ / _)]mulrA.
by rewrite divff ?mulr1 // -natrM pnatr_eq0.
Qed.

Lemma ImJ_sub (x : R[i]) : (Im x)%:C =  (x^*%C - x) / 2%:R * 'i%C.
Proof.
case: x => a b; simpc; rewrite [0 ^+ 2]mul0r addr0 /=.
rewrite -!mulr2n -mulr_natr -mulrA [_ * (_ / _)]mulrA.
by rewrite divff ?mulr1 ?opprK // -natrM pnatr_eq0.
Qed.

Lemma ger0_Im (x : R[i]) : 0 <= x -> Im x = 0.
Proof. by move: x=> [a b] /=; simpc => /andP [/eqP]. Qed.

(* Todo : extend theory of : *)
(*   - signed exponents *)

Lemma conj_ge0 : forall x, (0 <= x ^*) = (0 <= x).
Proof. by move=> [a b] /=; simpc; rewrite oppr_eq0. Qed.

Lemma conjc_nat : forall n, (n%:R : R[i])^* = n%:R.
Proof. exact: rmorph_nat. Qed.

Lemma conjc0 : (0 : R[i]) ^* = 0.
Proof. exact: (conjc_nat 0). Qed.

Lemma conjc1 : (1 : R[i]) ^* = 1.
Proof. exact: (conjc_nat 1). Qed.

Lemma conjc_eq0 : forall x, (x ^* == 0) = (x == 0).
Proof. by move=> [a b]; rewrite !eq_complex /= eqr_oppLR oppr0. Qed.

Lemma conjc_inv: forall x, (x^-1)^* = (x^*%C )^-1.
Proof. exact: fmorphV. Qed.

Lemma complex_root_conj (p : {poly R[i]}) (x : R[i]) :
  root (map_poly conjc p) x = root p x^*.
Proof. by rewrite /root -{1}[x]conjcK horner_map /= conjc_eq0. Qed.

Lemma complex_algebraic_trans (T : comNzRingType) (toR : {rmorphism T -> R}) :
  integralRange toR -> integralRange (real_complex R \o toR).
Proof.
set f := _ \o _ => R_integral [a b].
have integral_real k : integralOver f (k%:C) by apply: integral_rmorph.
rewrite [_ +i* _]complexE.
apply: integral_add => //; apply: integral_mul => //=.
exists ('X^2 + 1).
  by rewrite monicE lead_coefDl ?size_polyXn ?size_poly1 ?lead_coefXn.
by rewrite rmorphD rmorph1 /= ?map_polyXn rootE !hornerE sqr_i addNr.
Qed.

Lemma normc_def (z : R[i]) : `|z| = (sqrtr ((Re z)^+2 + (Im z)^+2))%:C.
Proof. by case: z. Qed.

Lemma add_Re2_Im2 (z : R[i]) : ((Re z)^+2 + (Im z)^+2)%:C = `|z|^+2.
Proof. by rewrite normc_def -rmorphXn sqr_sqrtr ?addr_ge0 ?sqr_ge0. Qed.

Lemma addcJ (z : R[i]) : z + z^*%C = 2%:R * (Re z)%:C.
Proof. by rewrite ReJ_add mulrC mulfVK ?pnatr_eq0. Qed.

Lemma subcJ (z : R[i]) : z - z^*%C = 2%:R * (Im z)%:C * 'i%C.
Proof.
rewrite ImJ_sub mulrCA mulrA mulfVK ?pnatr_eq0 //.
by rewrite -mulrA ['i%C * _]sqr_i mulrN1 opprB.
Qed.

Lemma complex_real (a b : R) : a +i* b \is Num.real = (b == 0).
Proof.
rewrite realE; simpc; rewrite [0 == _]eq_sym.
by have [] := ltrgtP 0 a; rewrite ?(andbF, andbT, orbF, orbb).
Qed.

Lemma complex_realP x : reflect (exists k, x = k%:C) (x \is Num.real).
Proof.
case: x=> [a b] /=; rewrite complex_real.
by apply: (iffP eqP) => [->|[c []//]]; exists a.
Qed.

Lemma RRe_real x : x \is Num.real -> (Re x)%:C = x.
Proof. by move=> /complex_realP [y ->]. Qed.

Lemma RIm_real x : x \is Num.real -> (Im x)%:C = 0.
Proof. by move=> /complex_realP [y ->]. Qed.

End ComplexTheory.

Section Rcomplex_normedZmodType.
Variable R : rcfType.
Implicit Types x y : Rcomplex R.

Import Normc.

Lemma le_normcD x y : (normc (x + y)) <= (normc x + normc y).
Proof. by rewrite -lecR rmorphD/=; exact: (@ler_normD _ R[i]). Qed.

Lemma normcMn x n : normc (x *+ n) = normc x *+ n.
Proof.
rewrite -[LHS]/(Re (_%:C)) -[RHS]/(Re (_%:C)) rmorphMn; congr Re. 
exact: (@normrMn _ R[i]).
Qed.

Lemma normcN x : normc (- x) = normc x.
Proof.
rewrite -[LHS]/(Re (_%:C)) -[RHS]/(Re (_%:C)); congr Re.
exact: (@normrN R[i] R[i]).
Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ := Num.Zmodule_isNormed.Build R (Rcomplex R)
  le_normcD (@eq0_normc R) normcMn normcN.
  
End Rcomplex_normedZmodType.

Tactic Notation "simpc" := do ?
  [ rewrite -[- (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C - (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C + (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C * (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C ^*]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[_ *: (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[@GRing.scale _ (Rcomplex _) _ (_ +i* _)%C]/(_ +i* _)%C
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C <= (_ +i* _)%C]/((_ == _) && (_ <= _))
  | rewrite -[(_ +i* _)%C < (_ +i* _)%C]/((_ == _) && (_ < _))
  | rewrite -[`|(_ +i* _)%C|]/(sqrtr (_ + _))%:C%C
  | rewrite (mulrNN, mulrN, mulNr, opprB, opprD, mulr0, mul0r,
    subr0, sub0r, addr0, add0r, mulr1, mul1r, subrr, opprK, oppr0,
    eqxx) ].

Section RComplexLMod.
Variable R : rcfType.
Implicit Types (k : R) (x y z : Rcomplex R).

Lemma conjc_is_scalable : scalable (@conjc R : Rcomplex R -> Rcomplex R).
Proof. by move=> a [b c]; simpc. Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ :=
  GRing.isScalable.Build R (Rcomplex R) (Rcomplex R) *:%R (@conjc R : Rcomplex R -> Rcomplex R) conjc_is_scalable.

End RComplexLMod.

(* Section RcfDef. *)

(* Variable R : realFieldType. *)
(* Notation C := (complex R). *)

(* Definition rcf_odd := forall (p : {poly R}), *)
(*   ~~odd (size p) -> {x | p.[x] = 0}. *)
(* Definition rcf_square := forall x : R, *)
(*   {y | (0 <= y) && if 0 <= x then (y ^ 2 == x) else y == 0}. *)

(* Lemma rcf_odd_sqr_from_ivt : rcf_axiom R -> rcf_odd * rcf_square. *)
(* Proof. *)
(* move=> ivt. *)
(* split. *)
(*   move=> p sp. *)
(*   move: (ivt p). *)
(*   admit. *)
(* move=> x. *)
(* case: (boolP (0 <= x)) (@ivt ('X^2 - x%:P) 0 (1 + x))=> px; last first. *)
(*   by move=> _; exists 0; rewrite lerr eqxx. *)
(* case. *)
(* * by rewrite ler_wpDr ?ler01. *)
(* * rewrite !horner_lin oppr_le0 px /=. *)
(*   rewrite subr_ge0 (@ler_trans _ (1 + x)) //. *)
(*     by rewrite ler_wpDl ?ler01 ?lerr. *)
(*   by rewrite ler_peMr // addrC -subr_ge0 ?addrK // subr0 ler_wpDl ?ler01. *)
(* * move=> y hy; rewrite /root !horner_lin; move/eqP. *)
(*   move/(canRL (@addrNK _ _)); rewrite add0r=> <-. *)
(* by exists y; case/andP: hy=> -> _; rewrite eqxx. *)
(* Qed. *)

(* Lemma ivt_from_closed : GRing.ClosedField.axiom [ringType of C] -> rcf_axiom R. *)
(* Proof. *)
(* rewrite /GRing.ClosedField.axiom /= => hclosed. *)
(* move=> p a b hab. *)
(* Admitted. *)

(* Lemma closed_form_rcf_odd_sqr : rcf_odd -> rcf_square *)
(*   -> GRing.ClosedField.axiom [ringType of C]. *)
(* Proof. *)
(* Admitted. *)

(* Lemma closed_form_ivt : rcf_axiom R -> GRing.ClosedField.axiom [ringType of C]. *)
(* Proof. *)
(* move/rcf_odd_sqr_from_ivt; case. *)
(* exact: closed_form_rcf_odd_sqr. *)
(* Qed. *)

(* End RcfDef. *)

Section ComplexClosed.

Variable R : rcfType.

Definition sqrtc (x : R[i]) : R[i] :=
  let: a +i* b := x in
  let sgr1 b := if b == 0 then 1 else sgr b in
  let r := sqrtr (a^+2 + b^+2) in
  (sqrtr ((r + a)/2%:R)) +i* (sgr1 b * sqrtr ((r - a)/2%:R)).

Lemma sqr_sqrtc : forall x, (sqrtc x) ^+ 2 = x.
Proof.
have sqr: forall x : R, x ^+ 2 = x * x.
  by move=> x; rewrite exprS expr1.
case=> a b; rewrite exprS expr1; simpc.
have F0: 2%:R != 0 :> R by rewrite pnatr_eq0.
have F1: 0 <= 2%:R^-1 :> R by rewrite invr_ge0 ler0n.
have F2: `|a| <= sqrtr (a^+2 + b^+2).
  rewrite -sqrtr_sqr ler_wsqrtr //.
  by rewrite addrC -subr_ge0 addrK exprn_even_ge0.
have F3: 0 <= (sqrtr (a ^+ 2 + b ^+ 2) - a) / 2%:R.
  rewrite mulr_ge0 // subr_ge0 (le_trans _ F2) //.
  by rewrite -(maxrN a) le_max lexx.
have F4: 0 <= (sqrtr (a ^+ 2 + b ^+ 2) + a) / 2%:R.
  rewrite mulr_ge0 // -{2}[a]opprK subr_ge0 (le_trans _ F2) //.
  by rewrite -(maxrN a) le_max lexx orbT.
congr (_ +i* _); set u := if _ then _ else _.
  rewrite mulrCA !mulrA.
  have->: (u * u) = 1.
    rewrite /u; case: (altP (_ =P _)); rewrite ?mul1r //.
    by rewrite -expr2 sqr_sg => ->.
  rewrite mul1r -!sqr !sqr_sqrtr //.
  rewrite [_+a]addrC -mulrBl opprD addrA addrK.
  by rewrite opprK -mulr2n -[a *+ 2]mulr_natl [_*a]mulrC mulfK.
rewrite mulrCA -mulrA -mulrDr [sqrtr _ * _]mulrC.
rewrite -mulr2n -sqrtrM // mulrAC !mulrA ?[_ * (_ - _)]mulrC -subr_sqr.
rewrite sqr_sqrtr.
  by rewrite ler_wpDr // exprn_even_ge0.
rewrite [_^+2 + _]addrC addrK -mulrA -expr2 sqrtrM ?exprn_even_ge0 //.
rewrite !sqrtr_sqr -(mulr_natr (_ * _)).
rewrite [`|_^-1|]ger0_norm // -mulrA [_ * _%:R]mulrC divff //.
rewrite mulr1 /u; case: (_ =P _)=>[->|].
  by rewrite normr0 mulr0.
by rewrite -numEsg.
Qed.

Lemma sqrtc_sqrtr :
  forall (x : R[i]), 0 <= x -> sqrtc x = (sqrtr (Re x))%:C.
Proof.
move=> [a b] /andP [/eqP->] /= a_ge0.
rewrite eqxx mul1r [0 ^+ _]exprS mul0r addr0 sqrtr_sqr.
rewrite ger0_norm // subrr mul0r sqrtr0 -mulr2n.
by rewrite -[_*+2]mulr_natr mulfK // pnatr_eq0.
Qed.

Lemma sqrtc0 : sqrtc 0 = 0.
Proof. by rewrite sqrtc_sqrtr ?lexx // sqrtr0. Qed.

Lemma sqrtc1 : sqrtc 1 = 1.
Proof. by rewrite sqrtc_sqrtr ?ler01 // sqrtr1. Qed.

Lemma sqrtN1 : sqrtc (-1) = 'i.
Proof.
rewrite /sqrtc /= oppr0 eqxx [0^+_]exprS mulr0 addr0.
rewrite exprS expr1 mulN1r opprK sqrtr1 subrr mul0r sqrtr0.
by rewrite mul1r -mulr2n divff ?sqrtr1 // pnatr_eq0.
Qed.

Lemma sqrtc_ge0 (x : R[i]) : (0 <= sqrtc x) = (0 <= x).
Proof.
apply/idP/idP=> [psx|px]; last first.
  by rewrite sqrtc_sqrtr // lecR sqrtr_ge0.
by rewrite -[x]sqr_sqrtc exprS expr1 mulr_ge0.
Qed.

Lemma sqrtc_eq0 (x : R[i]) : (sqrtc x == 0) = (x == 0).
Proof.
apply/eqP/eqP=> [eqs|->]; last by rewrite sqrtc0.
by rewrite -[x]sqr_sqrtc eqs exprS mul0r.
Qed.

Lemma normcE x : `|x| = sqrtc (x * x^*%C).
Proof.
case: x=> a b; simpc; rewrite [b * a]mulrC addNr sqrtc_sqrtr //.
by simpc; rewrite /= addr_ge0 ?sqr_ge0.
Qed.

Lemma sqr_normc (x : R[i]) : (`|x| ^+ 2) = x * x^*%C.
Proof. by rewrite normcE sqr_sqrtc. Qed.

Lemma normc_ge_Re (x : R[i]) : `|Re x|%:C <= `|x|.
Proof.
by case: x => a b; simpc; rewrite -sqrtr_sqr ler_wsqrtr // lerDl sqr_ge0.
Qed.

Lemma normcJ (x : R[i]) :  `|x^*%C| = `|x|.
Proof. by case: x => a b; simpc; rewrite /= sqrrN. Qed.

Lemma invc_norm (x : R[i]) : x^-1 = `|x|^-2 * x^*%C.
Proof.
case: (altP (x =P 0)) => [->|dx]; first by rewrite rmorph0 mulr0 invr0.
apply: (mulIf dx); rewrite mulrC divff // -mulrA [_^*%C * _]mulrC -(sqr_normc x).
by rewrite mulVf // expf_neq0 ?normr_eq0.
Qed.

Lemma canonical_form (a b c : R[i]) :
  a != 0 ->
  let d := b ^+ 2 - 4%:R * a * c in
  let r1 := (- b - sqrtc d) / 2%:R / a in
  let r2 := (- b + sqrtc d) / 2%:R / a in
  a *: 'X^2 + b *: 'X + c%:P = a *: (('X - r1%:P) * ('X - r2%:P)).
Proof.
move=> a_neq0 d r1 r2.
rewrite !(mulrDr, mulrDl, mulNr, mulrN, opprK, scalerDr).
rewrite [_ * _%:P]mulrC !mul_polyC !scalerN !scalerA -!addrA; congr (_ + _).
rewrite addrA; congr (_ + _).
  rewrite -opprD -scalerDl -scaleNr; congr(_ *: _).
  rewrite ![a * _]mulrC !divfK // !mulrDl addrACA !mulNr addNr addr0.
  rewrite -opprD opprK -mulrDr -mulr2n.
  by rewrite -(mulr_natl (_^-1)) divff ?mulr1 ?pnatr_eq0.
symmetry; rewrite -!alg_polyC scalerA; congr (_%:A).
rewrite [a * _]mulrC divfK // /r2 mulrA mulrACA -invfM -natrM -subr_sqr.
rewrite sqr_sqrtc sqrrN /d opprB addrC addrNK -(mulrA 4) -mulrA.
by rewrite mulrACA -natf_div // mul1r mulrAC divff ?mul1r.
Qed.

Lemma monic_canonical_form (b c : R[i]) :
  let d := b ^+ 2 - 4%:R * c in
  let r1 := (- b - sqrtc d) / 2%:R in
  let r2 := (- b + sqrtc d) / 2%:R in
  'X^2 + b *: 'X + c%:P = (('X - r1%:P) * ('X - r2%:P)).
Proof.
by rewrite /= -['X^2]scale1r canonical_form ?oner_eq0 // scale1r mulr1 !divr1.
Qed.

Section extramx.
(* missing lemmas from matrix.v or mxalgebra.v *)

Lemma mul_mx_rowfree_eq0 (K : fieldType) (m n p: nat)
                         (W : 'M[K]_(m,n)) (V : 'M[K]_(n,p)) :
  row_free V -> (W *m V == 0) = (W == 0).
Proof. by move=> free; rewrite -!mxrank_eq0 mxrankMfree ?mxrank_eq0. Qed.

Lemma sub_sums_genmxP (F : fieldType) (I : finType) (P : pred I) (m n : nat)
 (A : 'M[F]_(m, n)) (B_ : I -> 'M_(m, n)) :
reflect (exists u_ : I -> 'M_m, A = \sum_(i | P i) u_ i *m B_ i)
  (A <= \sum_(i | P i) <<B_ i>>)%MS.
Proof.
apply: (iffP idP); last first.
  by move=> [u_ ->]; rewrite summx_sub_sums // => i _; rewrite genmxE submxMl.
move=> /sub_sumsmxP [u_ hA].
have Hu i : exists v, u_ i *m  <<B_ i>>%MS = v *m B_ i.
  by apply/submxP; rewrite (submx_trans (submxMl _ _)) ?genmxE.
exists (fun i => projT1 (sig_eqW (Hu i))); rewrite hA.
by apply: eq_bigr => i /= P_i; case: sig_eqW.
Qed.

Lemma mulmxP (K : fieldType) (m n : nat) (A B : 'M[K]_(m, n)) :
  reflect (forall u : 'rV__, u *m A = u *m B) (A == B).
Proof.
apply: (iffP eqP) => [-> //|eqAB].
apply: (@row_full_inj _ _ _ _ 1%:M); first by rewrite row_full_unit unitmx1.
by apply/row_matrixP => i; rewrite !row_mul eqAB.
Qed.

Section Skew.

Variable (K : numFieldType).

Implicit Types (phK : phant K) (n : nat).

Definition skew_vec n i j : 'rV[K]_(n * n) :=
   (mxvec ((delta_mx i j)) - (mxvec (delta_mx j i))).

Definition skew_def phK n : 'M[K]_(n * n) :=
  (\sum_(i | ((i.2 : 'I__) < (i.1 : 'I__))%N) <<skew_vec i.1 i.2>>)%MS.

Variable (n : nat).
Local Notation skew := (@skew_def (Phant K) n).


Lemma skew_direct_sum : mxdirect skew.
Proof.
apply/mxdirect_sumsE => /=; split => [i _|]; first exact: mxdirect_trivial.
apply/mxdirect_sumsP => [] [i j] /= lt_ij; apply/eqP; rewrite -submx0.
apply/rV_subP => v; rewrite sub_capmx => /andP []; rewrite !genmxE.
move=> /submxP [w ->] /sub_sums_genmxP [/= u_].
move/matrixP => /(_ 0 (mxvec_index i j)); rewrite !mxE /= big_ord1.
rewrite /skew_vec /= !mxvec_delta !mxE !eqxx /=.
have /(_ _ _ (_, _) (_, _)) /= eq_mviE :=
  inj_eq (bij_inj (onT_bij (curry_mxvec_bij _ _))).
rewrite eq_mviE xpair_eqE -!val_eqE /= eq_sym andbb.
rewrite ltn_eqF // subr0 mulr1 summxE big1; last first.
  rewrite [w as X in X *m _]mx11_scalar => ->.
  by rewrite mul_scalar_mx scale0r submx0.
move=> [i' j'] /= /andP[lt_j'i'].
rewrite xpair_eqE /= => neq'_ij.
rewrite /= !mxvec_delta !mxE big_ord1 !mxE !eqxx !eq_mviE.
rewrite !xpair_eqE /= [_ == i']eq_sym [_ == j']eq_sym (negPf neq'_ij) /=.
set z := (_ && _); suff /negPf -> : ~~ z by rewrite subrr mulr0.
by apply: contraL lt_j'i' => /andP [/eqP <- /eqP <-]; rewrite ltnNge ltnW.
Qed.
Hint Resolve skew_direct_sum : core.

Lemma rank_skew : \rank skew = (n * n.-1)./2.
Proof.
rewrite /skew (mxdirectP _) //= -bin2 -bin2_sum big_mkord.
rewrite (eq_bigr (fun _ => 1%N)).
  move=> [i j] /= lt_ij; rewrite genmxE.
  apply/eqP; rewrite eqn_leq rank_leq_row /= lt0n mxrank_eq0.
  rewrite /skew_vec /= !mxvec_delta /= subr_eq0.
  set j1 := mxvec_index _ _.
  apply/negP => /eqP /matrixP /(_ 0 j1) /=; rewrite !mxE /= eqxx.
  have /(_ _ _ (_, _) (_, _)) -> :=
    inj_eq (bij_inj (onT_bij (curry_mxvec_bij _ _))).
  rewrite xpair_eqE -!val_eqE /= eq_sym andbb ltn_eqF //.
  by move/eqP; rewrite oner_eq0.
transitivity (\sum_(i < n) (\sum_(j < n | j < i) 1))%N.
  by rewrite pair_big_dep.
apply: eq_bigr => [] [[|i] Hi] _ /=; first by rewrite big1.
rewrite (eq_bigl _ _ (fun _ => ltnS _ _)).
have [n_eq0|n_gt0] := posnP n; first by move: Hi (Hi); rewrite {1}n_eq0.
rewrite -[n]prednK // big_ord_narrow_leq /=.
  by rewrite sum_nat_const card_ord muln1.
by rewrite -ltnS prednK // (leq_trans _ Hi).
Qed.

Lemma skewP (M : 'rV_(n * n)) :
  reflect ((vec_mx M)^T = - vec_mx M) (M <= skew)%MS.
Proof.
apply: (iffP idP).
  move/sub_sumsmxP => [v ->]; rewrite !linear_sum /=.
  apply: eq_bigr => [] [i j] /= lt_ij; rewrite !mulmx_sum_row !linear_sum /=.
  apply: eq_bigr => k _; rewrite !linearZ /=; congr (_ *: _) => {v}.
  set r := << _ >>%MS; move: (row _ _) (row_sub k r) => v.
  move: @r; rewrite /= genmxE => /sub_rVP [a ->]; rewrite !linearZ /=.
  by rewrite /skew_vec !linearB /= !mxvecK !scalerN opprK addrC !trmx_delta.
move=> skewM; pose M' := vec_mx M.
pose xM i j := (M' i j - M' j i) *: skew_vec i j.
suff -> : M = 2%:R^-1 *:
   (\sum_(i | true && ((i.2 : 'I__) < (i.1 : 'I__))%N) xM i.1 i.2).
  rewrite scalemx_sub // summx_sub_sums // => [] [i j] /= lt_ij.
  by rewrite scalemx_sub // genmxE.
rewrite /xM /= /skew_vec (eq_bigr _ (fun _ _ => scalerBr _ _ _)).
rewrite big_split /= sumrN !(eq_bigr _ (fun _ _ => scalerBl _ _ _)).
rewrite !big_split /= !sumrN opprD ?opprK addrACA [- _ + _]addrC.
rewrite -!sumrN -2!big_split /=.
rewrite /xM /= /skew_vec -!(eq_bigr _ (fun _ _ => scalerBr _ _ _)).
apply: (can_inj vec_mxK); rewrite !(linearZ, linearB, linearD, linear_sum) /=.
have -> /= : vec_mx M = 2%:R^-1 *: (M' - M'^T).
  by rewrite skewM opprK -mulr2n -scaler_nat scalerA mulVf ?pnatr_eq0 ?scale1r.
rewrite [M' in LHS]matrix_sum_delta; congr (_ *: _).
rewrite pair_big /= !linear_sum /= -big_split /=.
rewrite (bigID (fun ij => (ij.2 : 'I__) < (ij.1 : 'I__))%N) /=; congr (_ + _).
  apply: eq_bigr => [] [i j] /= lt_ij.
  by rewrite !linearZ linearB /= ?mxvecK trmx_delta scalerN scalerBr.
rewrite (bigID (fun ij => (ij.1 : 'I__) == (ij.2 : 'I__))%N) /=.
rewrite big1 ?add0r.
  by move=> [i j] /= /andP[_ /eqP ->]; rewrite linearZ /= trmx_delta subrr.
rewrite (@reindex_inj _ _ _ _ (fun ij => (ij.2, ij.1))) /=.
  by move=> [? ?] [? ?] [] -> ->.
apply: eq_big => [] [i j] /=; first by rewrite -leqNgt ltn_neqAle andbC.
by rewrite !linearZ linearB /= ?mxvecK trmx_delta scalerN scalerBr.
Qed.

End Skew.

Notation skew K n := (@skew_def _ (Phant K) n).

Section Restriction.

Variable K : fieldType.
Variable m : nat.
Variable (V : 'M[K]_m).

Implicit Types f : 'M[K]_m.

Definition restrict f : 'M_(\rank V) := row_base V *m f *m (pinvmx (row_base V)).

Lemma stable_row_base f :
  (row_base V *m f <= row_base V)%MS = (V *m f <= V)%MS.
Proof.
rewrite eq_row_base.
by apply/idP/idP=> /(submx_trans _) ->; rewrite ?submxMr ?eq_row_base.
Qed.

Lemma eigenspace_restrict f : (V *m f <= V)%MS ->
  forall n a (W : 'M_(n, \rank V)),
  (W <= eigenspace (restrict f) a)%MS =
  (W *m row_base V <= eigenspace f a)%MS.
Proof.
move=> f_stabV n a W; apply/eigenspaceP/eigenspaceP; rewrite scalemxAl.
  by move<-; rewrite -mulmxA -[X in _ = X]mulmxA mulmxKpV ?stable_row_base.
move/(congr1 (mulmx^~ (pinvmx (row_base V)))).
rewrite -2!mulmxA [_ *m (f *m _)]mulmxA => ->.
by apply: (row_free_inj (row_base_free V)); rewrite mulmxKpV ?submxMl.
Qed.

Lemma eigenvalue_restrict  f : (V *m f <= V)%MS ->
  {subset eigenvalue (restrict f) <= eigenvalue f}.
Proof.
move=> f_stabV a /eigenvalueP [x /eigenspaceP]; rewrite eigenspace_restrict //.
move=> /eigenspaceP Hf x_neq0; apply/eigenvalueP.
by exists (x *m row_base V); rewrite ?mul_mx_rowfree_eq0 ?row_base_free.
Qed.

Lemma restrictM : {in [pred f | (V *m f <= V)%MS] &,
                      {morph restrict : f g / f *m g}}.
Proof.
move=> f g; rewrite !inE => Vf Vg /=.
by rewrite /restrict 2!mulmxA mulmxA mulmxKpV ?stable_row_base.
Qed.

End Restriction.

End extramx.
Notation skew K n := (@skew_def _ (Phant K) n).

Section Paper_HarmDerksen.

(* Following    http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~hderksen/preprints/linalg.pdf *)
(* quite literally except for Lemma5 where we don't use  hermitian matrices. *)
(* Instead we encode the morphism by hand in 'M[R]_(n * n), which turns  out *)
(* to  be very clumsy for  formalizing commutation and the end  of Lemma  4. *)
(* Moreover, the Qed takes time, so it would be far much better to formalize *)
(* Herm C n and use it instead !                                             *)

Implicit Types (K : fieldType).

Definition CommonEigenVec_def K (phK : phant K) (d r : nat) :=
  forall (m : nat) (V : 'M[K]_m), ~~ (d %| \rank V) ->
  forall (sf :  seq 'M_m), size sf = r ->
  {in sf, forall f, (V *m f <= V)%MS} ->
  {in sf &, forall f g, f *m g = g *m f} ->
  exists2 v : 'rV_m, (v != 0) & forall f, f \in sf ->
  exists a, (v <= eigenspace f a)%MS.
Notation CommonEigenVec K d r := (@CommonEigenVec_def _ (Phant K) d r).

Definition Eigen1Vec_def K (phK : phant K) (d : nat) :=
  forall (m : nat) (V : 'M[K]_m), ~~ (d %| \rank V) ->
  forall (f : 'M_m), (V *m f <= V)%MS -> exists a, eigenvalue f a.
Notation Eigen1Vec K d := (@Eigen1Vec_def _ (Phant K) d).

Lemma Eigen1VecP (K : fieldType) (d : nat) :
  CommonEigenVec K d 1%N <-> Eigen1Vec K d.
Proof.
split=> [Hd m V HV f|Hd m V HV [] // f [] // _ /(_ _ (mem_head _ _))] f_stabV.
  have [] := Hd _ _ HV [::f] (erefl _).
  + by move=> ?; rewrite in_cons orbF => /eqP ->.
  + by move=> ? ?; rewrite /= !in_cons !orbF => /eqP -> /eqP ->.
  move=> v v_neq0 /(_ f (mem_head _ _)) [a /eigenspaceP].
  by exists a; apply/eigenvalueP; exists v.
have [a /eigenvalueP [v /eigenspaceP v_eigen v_neq0]] := Hd _ _ HV _ f_stabV.
by exists v => // ?; rewrite in_cons orbF => /eqP ->; exists a.
Qed.

Lemma Lemma3 K d : Eigen1Vec K d -> forall r, CommonEigenVec K d r.+1.
Proof.
move=> E1V_K_d; elim=> [|r IHr m V]; first exact/Eigen1VecP.
move: (\rank V) {-2}V (leqnn (\rank V)) => n {V}.
elim: n m => [|n IHn] m V.
  by rewrite leqn0 => /eqP ->; rewrite dvdn0.
move=> le_rV_Sn HrV [] // f sf /= [] ssf f_sf_stabV f_sf_comm.
have [->|f_neq0] := altP (f =P 0).
  have [||v v_neq0 Hsf] := (IHr _ _ HrV _ ssf).
  + by move=> g f_sf /=; rewrite f_sf_stabV // in_cons f_sf orbT.
  + move=> g h g_sf h_sf /=.
    by apply: f_sf_comm; rewrite !in_cons ?g_sf ?h_sf ?orbT.
  exists v => // g; rewrite in_cons => /orP [/eqP->|]; last exact: Hsf.
  by exists 0; apply/eigenspaceP; rewrite mulmx0 scale0r.
have f_stabV : (V *m f <= V)%MS by rewrite f_sf_stabV ?mem_head.
have sf_stabV : {in sf, forall f, (V *m f <= V)%MS}.
  by move=> g g_sf /=; rewrite f_sf_stabV // in_cons g_sf orbT.
pose f' := restrict V f; pose sf' := map (restrict V) sf.
have [||a a_eigen_f'] := E1V_K_d _ 1%:M _ f'; do ?by rewrite ?mxrank1 ?submx1.
pose W := (eigenspace f' a)%MS; pose Z := (f' - a%:M).
have rWZ : (\rank W + \rank Z)%N = \rank V.
  by rewrite (mxrank_ker (f' - a%:M)) subnK // rank_leq_row.
have f'_stabW : (W *m f' <= W)%MS.
  by rewrite (eigenspaceP (submx_refl _)) scalemx_sub.
have f'_stabZ : (Z *m f' <= Z)%MS.
  rewrite (submx_trans _ (submxMl f' _)) //.
  by rewrite mulmxDl mulmxDr mulmxN mulNmx scalar_mxC.
have sf'_comm : {in [::f' & sf'] &, forall f g, f *m g = g *m f}.
  move=> g' h' /=; rewrite -!map_cons.
  move=> /mapP [g g_s_sf -> {g'}] /mapP [h h_s_sf -> {h'}].
  by rewrite -!restrictM ?inE /= ?f_sf_stabV // f_sf_comm.
have sf'_stabW : {in sf', forall f, (W *m f <= W)%MS}.
  move=> g g_sf /=; apply/eigenspaceP.
  rewrite -mulmxA -[g *m _]sf'_comm ?(mem_head, in_cons, g_sf, orbT) //.
  by rewrite mulmxA scalemxAl (eigenspaceP (submx_refl _)).
have sf'_stabZ : {in sf', forall f, (Z *m f <= Z)%MS}.
  move=> g g_sf /=.
  rewrite mulmxBl sf'_comm ?(mem_head, in_cons, g_sf, orbT) //.
  by rewrite -scalar_mxC -mulmxBr submxMl.
have [eqWV|neqWV] := altP (@eqmxP _ _ _ _ W 1%:M).
  have [] // := IHr _ W _ sf'; do ?by rewrite ?eqWV ?mxrank1 ?size_map.
    move=> g h g_sf' h_sf'; apply: sf'_comm;
    by rewrite in_cons (g_sf', h_sf') orbT.
  move=> v v_neq0 Hv; exists (v *m row_base V).
    by rewrite mul_mx_rowfree_eq0 ?row_base_free.
  move=> g; rewrite in_cons => /orP [/eqP ->|g_sf]; last first.
    have [|b] := Hv (restrict V g); first by rewrite map_f.
    by rewrite eigenspace_restrict // ?sf_stabV //; exists b.
  by exists a; rewrite -eigenspace_restrict // eqWV submx1.
have lt_WV : (\rank W < \rank V)%N.
  rewrite -[X in (_ < X)%N](@mxrank1 K) rank_ltmx //.
  by rewrite ltmxEneq neqWV // submx1.
have ltZV : (\rank Z < \rank V)%N.
  rewrite -[X in (_ < X)%N]rWZ -subn_gt0 addnK lt0n mxrank_eq0 -lt0mx.
  move: a_eigen_f' => /eigenvalueP [v /eigenspaceP] sub_vW v_neq0.
  by rewrite (ltmx_sub_trans _ sub_vW) // lt0mx.
have [] // := IHn _ (if d %| \rank Z then W else Z) _ _ [:: f' & sf'].
+ by rewrite -ltnS (@leq_trans (\rank V)) //; case: ifP.
+ by apply: contra HrV; case: ifP => [*|-> //]; rewrite -rWZ dvdn_add.
+ by rewrite /= size_map ssf.
+ move=> g; rewrite in_cons => /= /orP [/eqP -> {g}|g_sf']; case: ifP => _ //;
  by rewrite (sf'_stabW, sf'_stabZ).
move=> v v_neq0 Hv; exists (v *m row_base V).
  by rewrite mul_mx_rowfree_eq0 ?row_base_free.
move=> g Hg; have [|b] := Hv (restrict V g); first by rewrite -map_cons map_f.
rewrite eigenspace_restrict //; last by exists b.
by move: Hg; rewrite in_cons => /orP [/eqP -> //|/sf_stabV].
Qed.

Lemma Lemma4 r : CommonEigenVec R 2 r.+1.
Proof.
apply: Lemma3=> m V hV f f_stabV.
have [|a] := @odd_poly_root _ (char_poly (restrict V f)).
  by rewrite size_char_poly /= -dvdn2.
rewrite -eigenvalue_root_char => /eigenvalueP [v] /eigenspaceP v_eigen v_neq0.
exists a; apply/eigenvalueP; exists (v *m row_base V).
  by apply/eigenspaceP; rewrite -eigenspace_restrict.
by rewrite mul_mx_rowfree_eq0 ?row_base_free.
Qed.

Notation toC := (real_complex R).
Notation MtoC := (map_mx toC).

Lemma Lemma5 : Eigen1Vec R[i] 2.
Proof.
move=> m V HrV f f_stabV.
suff: exists a, eigenvalue (restrict V f) a.
  by move=> [a /eigenvalue_restrict Hf]; exists a; apply: Hf.
move: (\rank V) (restrict V f) => {f f_stabV V m} n f in HrV *.
pose u := map_mx (@Re R) f; pose v := map_mx (@Im R) f.
have fE : f = MtoC u + 'i%C *: MtoC v.
  rewrite /u /v [f]lock; apply/matrixP => i j; rewrite !mxE /=.
  by case: (locked f i j) => a b; simpc.
move: u v => u v in fE *.
pose L1fun : 'M[R]_n -> _ :=
  2%:R^-1 \*: (mulmxr u       \+ (mulmxr v \o trmx)
           \+ ((mulmx (u^T)) \- (mulmx (v^T) \o trmx))).
pose L1 := lin_mx L1fun.
pose L2fun : 'M[R]_n -> _ :=
  2%:R^-1 \*: (((@GRing.opp _) \o (mulmxr u \o trmx) \+ mulmxr v)
           \+ ((mulmx (u^T) \o trmx)               \+ (mulmx (v^T)))).
pose L2 := lin_mx L2fun.
have [] := @Lemma4 _ _ 1%:M _ [::L1; L2] (erefl _).
+ by move: HrV; rewrite mxrank1 !dvdn2 ?negbK oddM andbb.
+ by move=> ? _ /=; rewrite submx1.
+ suff {f fE}: L1 *m L2 = L2 *m L1.
    move: L1 L2 => L1 L2 commL1L2 La Lb.
    rewrite !{1}in_cons !{1}in_nil !{1}orbF.
    by move=> /orP [] /eqP -> /orP [] /eqP -> //; symmetry.
  apply/eqP/mulmxP => x; rewrite [X in X = _]mulmxA [X in _ = X]mulmxA.
  rewrite 4!mul_rV_lin !mxvecK /= /L1fun /L2fun /=; congr (mxvec (_ *: _)).
  move=> {L1 L2 L1fun L2fun}.
  case: n {x} (vec_mx x) => [//|n] x in HrV u v *.
  do ?[rewrite -(scalemxAl, scalemxAr, scalerN, scalerDr)
      |rewrite (mulmxN, mulNmx, trmxK, trmx_mul)
      |rewrite ?[(_ *: _)^T]linearZ ?[(_ + _)^T]linearD ?[(- _)^T]linearN /=].
  congr (_ *: _).
  rewrite !(mulmxDr, mulmxDl, mulNmx, mulmxN, mulmxA, opprD, opprK).
  do ![move: (_ *m _ *m _)] => t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 t10 t11 t12.
  rewrite [X in X + _ + _]addrC [X in X + _ = _]addrACA.
  rewrite [X in _ = (_ + _ + X) + _]addrC [X in _ = X + _]addrACA.
  rewrite [X in _ + (_ + _ + X) = _]addrC [X in _ + X = _]addrACA.
  rewrite [X in _ = _ + (X + _)]addrC [X in _ = _ + X]addrACA.
  rewrite [X in X = _]addrACA [X in _ = X]addrACA; congr (_ + _).
  by rewrite addrC [X in X + _ = _]addrACA [X in _ + X = _]addrACA.
move=> g g_neq0 Hg; have [] := (Hg L1, Hg L2).
rewrite !(mem_head, in_cons, orbT) => [].
move=> [//|a /eigenspaceP g_eigenL1] [//|b /eigenspaceP g_eigenL2].
rewrite !mul_rV_lin /= /L1fun /L2fun /= in g_eigenL1 g_eigenL2.
do [move=> /(congr1 vec_mx); rewrite mxvecK linearZ /=] in g_eigenL1.
do [move=> /(congr1 vec_mx); rewrite mxvecK linearZ /=] in g_eigenL2.
move=> {L1 L2 L1fun L2fun Hg HrV}.
set vg := vec_mx g in g_eigenL1 g_eigenL2.
exists (a +i* b); apply/eigenvalueP.
pose w := (MtoC vg - 'i%C *: MtoC vg^T).
exists (nz_row w); last first.
  rewrite nz_row_eq0 subr_eq0; apply: contraNneq g_neq0 => Hvg.
  rewrite -vec_mx_eq0; apply/eqP/matrixP => i j; rewrite !mxE /=.
  move: Hvg => /matrixP /(_ i j); rewrite !mxE /=; case.
  by rewrite !(mul0r, mulr0, add0r, mul1r, oppr0) => ->.
apply/eigenspaceP.
case: n f => [|n] f in u v g g_neq0 vg w fE g_eigenL1 g_eigenL2 *.
  by rewrite thinmx0 eqxx in g_neq0.
rewrite (submx_trans (nz_row_sub _)) //; apply/eigenspaceP.
rewrite fE [a +i* b]complexE /=.
rewrite !(mulmxDr, mulmxBl, =^~scalemxAr, =^~scalemxAl) -!map_mxM.
rewrite !(scalerDl, scalerDr, scalerN, =^~scalemxAr, =^~scalemxAl).
rewrite !scalerA /= mulrAC ['i%C * _]sqr_i ?mulN1r scaleN1r scaleNr !opprK.
rewrite [_ * 'i%C]mulrC -!scalerA -!map_mxZ /=.
rewrite ['i%C *: _ + _]addrC [LHS]addrACA ['i%C *: _ + _]addrC [RHS]addrACA.
rewrite [X in _ + _ + X]addrC -scalerBr -!(rmorphB, rmorphD)/=.
rewrite [- _ + _ in RHS]addrC -scalerBr -!(rmorphB, rmorphD)/=.
congr (_ + 'i%C *: _); congr map_mx; rewrite -[_ *: _^T]linearZ /=;
rewrite -g_eigenL1 -g_eigenL2 linearZ -(scalerDr, scalerBr);
do ?rewrite ?trmxK ?trmx_mul ?[(_ + _)^T]linearD ?[(- _)^T]linearN /=;
rewrite -[in X in _ *: (_ + X)]addrC 1?opprD 1?opprB ?mulmxN ?mulNmx;
rewrite [X in _ *: X]addrACA.
  rewrite -mulr2n [X in _ *: (_ + X)]addrACA subrr addNr !addr0.
  by rewrite -scaler_nat scalerA mulVf ?pnatr_eq0 // scale1r.
rewrite subrr addr0 addrA addrAC -addrA -mulr2n addrC.
by rewrite -scaler_nat scalerA mulVf ?pnatr_eq0 // scale1r.
Qed.

Lemma Lemma6 k r : CommonEigenVec R[i] (2^k.+1) r.+1.
Proof.
elim: k {-2}k (leqnn k) r => [|k IHk] l.
  by rewrite leqn0 => /eqP ->; apply: Lemma3; apply: Lemma5.
rewrite leq_eqVlt ltnS => /orP [/eqP ->|/IHk //] r {l}.
apply: Lemma3 => m V Hn f f_stabV {r}.
have [dvd2n|Ndvd2n] := boolP (2 %| \rank V); last first.
  exact: @Lemma5 _ _ Ndvd2n _ f_stabV.
suff: exists a, eigenvalue (restrict V f) a.
  by move=> [a /eigenvalue_restrict Hf]; exists a; apply: Hf.
case: (\rank V) (restrict V f) => {f f_stabV V m} [|n] f in Hn dvd2n *.
  by rewrite dvdn0 in Hn.
pose L1 := lin_mx (mulmxr f \+ mulmx f^T).
pose L2 := lin_mx (mulmxr f \o mulmx f^T).
have [] /= := IHk _ (leqnn _) _  _ (skew R[i] n.+1) _ [::L1; L2] (erefl _).
+ rewrite rank_skew; apply: contra Hn.
  rewrite -(@dvdn_pmul2r 2) //= -expnSr muln2 -[_.*2]add0n.
  have n_odd : odd n by rewrite dvdn2 /= ?negbK in dvd2n *.
  have {2}<- : odd (n.+1 * n) = 0%N :> nat by rewrite oddM /= andNb.
  by rewrite odd_double_half Gauss_dvdl // coprime_pexpl // coprime2n.
+ move=> L; rewrite 2!in_cons in_nil orbF => /orP [] /eqP ->;
  apply/rV_subP => v /submxP [s -> {v}]; rewrite mulmxA; apply/skewP;
  set u := _ *m skew _ _;
  do [have /skewP : (u <= skew R[i] n.+1)%MS by rewrite submxMl];
  rewrite mul_rV_lin /= !mxvecK => skew_u.
    by rewrite opprD linearD /= !trmx_mul skew_u mulmxN mulNmx addrC trmxK.
  by rewrite !trmx_mul trmxK skew_u mulNmx mulmxN mulmxA.
+ suff commL1L2: L1 *m L2 = L2 *m L1.
    move=> La Lb; rewrite !in_cons !in_nil !orbF.
    by move=> /orP [] /eqP -> /orP [] /eqP -> //; symmetry.
  apply/eqP/mulmxP => u; rewrite !mulmxA !mul_rV_lin ?mxvecK /=.
  by rewrite !(mulmxDr, mulmxDl, mulmxA).
move=> v v_neq0 HL1L2; have [] := (HL1L2 L1, HL1L2 L2).
rewrite !(mem_head, in_cons) orbT => [] [] // a vL1 [] // b vL2 {HL1L2}.
move/eigenspaceP in vL1; move/eigenspaceP in vL2.
move: vL2 => /(congr1 vec_mx); rewrite linearZ mul_rV_lin /= mxvecK.
move: vL1 => /(congr1 vec_mx); rewrite linearZ mul_rV_lin /= mxvecK.
move=> /(canRL (addKr _)) ->; rewrite mulmxDl mulNmx => Hv.
pose p := 'X^2 + (- a) *: 'X + b%:P.
have : vec_mx v *m (horner_mx f p) = 0.
  rewrite !(rmorphN, rmorphB, rmorphD, rmorphM) /= linearZ /=.
  rewrite horner_mx_X horner_mx_C !mulmxDr mul_mx_scalar -Hv.
  rewrite addrAC addrA mulmxA addrN add0r.
  by rewrite -scalemxAl -scalemxAr scaleNr addrN.
rewrite [p]monic_canonical_form; move: (_ / 2%:R) (_ / 2%:R).
move=> r2 r1 {Hv p a b L1 L2 Hn}.
rewrite rmorphM /= !rmorphB /= horner_mx_X !horner_mx_C mulmxA => Hv.
have: exists2 w : 'M_n.+1, w != 0 & exists a, (w <= eigenspace f a)%MS.
  move: Hv; set w := vec_mx _ *m _.
  have [w_eq0 _|w_neq0 r2_eigen] := altP (w =P 0).
    exists (vec_mx v); rewrite ?vec_mx_eq0 //; exists r1.
    apply/eigenspaceP/eqP.
    by rewrite -mul_mx_scalar -subr_eq0 -mulmxBr -/w w_eq0.
  exists w => //; exists r2; apply/eigenspaceP/eqP.
  by rewrite -mul_mx_scalar -subr_eq0 -mulmxBr r2_eigen.
move=> [w w_neq0 [a /(submx_trans (nz_row_sub _)) /eigenspaceP Hw]].
by exists a; apply/eigenvalueP; exists (nz_row w); rewrite ?nz_row_eq0.
Qed.

(* We enunciate a corollary of Theorem 7 *)
Corollary Theorem7' (m : nat) (f : 'M[R[i]]_m) : (0 < m)%N -> exists a, eigenvalue f a.
Proof.
case: m f => // m f _; have /Eigen1VecP := @Lemma6 m 0.
move=> /(_ m.+1 1 _ f) []; last by move=> a; exists a.
+ by rewrite mxrank1 (contra (dvdn_leq _)) // -ltnNge ltn_expl.
+ by rewrite submx1.
Qed.

Lemma complex_acf_axiom : GRing.closed_field_axiom R[i].
Proof.
move=> n c n_gt0; pose p := 'X^n - \poly_(i < n) c i.
suff [x rpx] : exists x, root p x.
  exists x; move: rpx; rewrite /root /p hornerD hornerN hornerXn subr_eq0.
  by move=> /eqP ->; rewrite horner_poly.
have p_monic : p \is monic.
  rewrite qualifE/= lead_coefDl ?lead_coefXn //.
  by rewrite size_polyN size_polyXn ltnS size_poly.
have sp_gt1 : (size p > 1)%N.
  by rewrite size_polyDl size_polyXn // size_polyN ltnS size_poly.
case: n n_gt0 p => //= n _ p in p_monic sp_gt1 *.
have [] := Theorem7' (companionmx p); first by rewrite -(subnK sp_gt1) addn2.
by move=> x; rewrite eigenvalue_root_char companionmxK //; exists x.
Qed.

HB.instance Definition _ := Field_isAlgClosed.Build R[i] complex_acf_axiom.

HB.instance Definition _ := Num.NumField_isImaginary.Build R[i]
  (sqr_i R) sqr_normc.
HB.instance Definition _ := GRing.ClosedField.on (Rcomplex R).

End Paper_HarmDerksen.

End ComplexClosed.

Section ComplexClosedTheory.

Variable R : rcfType.

Lemma complexiE : 'i%C = 'i%R :> R[i].
Proof. by []. Qed.

Lemma complexRe (x : R[i]) : (Re x)%:C = 'Re x.
Proof.
rewrite {1}[x]Crect raddfD /= mulrC ReiNIm rmorphB /=.
by rewrite ?RRe_real ?RIm_real ?Creal_Im ?Creal_Re // subr0.
Qed.

Lemma complexIm (x : R[i]) : (Im x)%:C = 'Im x.
Proof.
rewrite {1}[x]Crect raddfD /= mulrC ImiRe rmorphD /=.
by rewrite ?RRe_real ?RIm_real ?Creal_Im ?Creal_Re // add0r.
Qed.

End ComplexClosedTheory.

Definition complexalg := realalg[i].

HB.instance Definition _ := Num.ClosedField.on complexalg.

Lemma complexalg_algebraic : integralRange (@ratr complexalg).
Proof.
move=> x; suff [p p_monic] : integralOver (real_complex _ \o realalg_of _) x.
  by rewrite (eq_map_poly (fmorph_eq_rat _)); exists p.
by apply: complex_algebraic_trans; apply: realalg_algebraic.
Qed.
